dvdfab passkey can not purchase from australaia

I believe that the attorneys of Samsung, Pioneer etc.

If one places it in its context, it must be 100% for cinavia. In my opinion, if one reads the passage alone, he might believe one can escape cinavia (because it's still not 100% no-cinavia). Is there anything to show it was compulsory back in 2010? The passage clearly states 'but shall not have to comply with changes to the Specifications or Compliance Rules, or sunrise of new obligations (e.g., the Watermark Screening Obligations)'Īssuming 1st Feb was the sunrise date of the Cinavia obligation, ie when it became mandatory as even Verance's website claims, products sold before that date aren't obliged to include Cinavia, so the only way your claim makes sense to me, is if Cinavia was actually compulsory back in 2010. Where did you get 2010 as being the first sunset? How do you know SoCs already had it on board and followed a different certification? What certification was that? And this refer to products made after 2010 (first sunset) - and they do already contain cinavia by the simple fact that the SoCs already have it on-board.

That passage is only an exception, and in my opinion concerns only a change in the watermarking detection ie whether it changes, the product already on sale may not be retrofitted if the manufacturer doesn't want it.

Dvdfab passkey can not purchase from australaia